| Rate the story Living Doll (D 2009-278) | | You can only vote when you are logged in. | |
User comments| Kahkonen | | | | Tuesday, Aug 9, 2011, 05:22:59 PM | Liikaa hutkimista. | | Julius Spectaculus | | | | Friday, Oct 27, 2017, 12:19:57 PM | The Shaws can seemingly turn any good idea into a horrible violence outburst. Even Cavazzano is way below his usual standard here. Just compare to the other "Gulliver" story (https://inducks.org/story.php?c=D+2009-298) and see what I mean. Whereas the McGreals seemed to genuinely care about portraying the relationship between Donald and Daisy in a nice light AND have come up with some funny ideas around the main scenario, I get the impression that the Shaws just asked themselves "How can we find a reason why Donald would want to try and kill Daisy" and then constructed the entire plot around that. Instead, they should have tried to actually think about using the idea of Gulliver's Travels for something interesting. Alas, the main part of the story is really no different from "Hypnotically Henpecked" or "Ring Thrice and I'll Clobber You, My Lad". I have no issue with good ideas being recycled, but this?
And did we need Cavazzano to draw what is basically a cross between Bancells and Andersen at his worst? No, I don't think so.
Sorry, it's a 0/10 for me. | | Alex Luther | | | | Wednesday, Jun 13, 2018, 09:33:10 AM | Unbearable amounts of Shaw violence here, but the plot itself is okay, and the invented language is funny (at least in the German translation). Even with as uninspired drawings as these (he probably didn't want to waste effort in such a bad story), Cavazzano is still way better than most of the other Egmont artists. 3/10 | | missdisneypl | | | | Sunday, May 17, 2020, 11:22:24 PM | 5/10
23.12.2019 |
The information in the Inducks database is available under the conditions as mentioned in the Inducks licence. The pictures on this website are the property of Disney and are not part of Inducks.
|
